![]() ![]() # For security consideration, please set to match the host/domain of your site, e.g., ALLOWED_HOSTS =. Seahub caches items(avatars, profiles, etc) on file system by default(/tmp/seahub_cache/). If you want to disable settings via web interface, you can add `ENABLE_SETTINGS_VIA_WEB = False` to `seahub_settings.py`. They have a higher priority over the items in config files. The config items are saved in database table (seahub-db/constance_config). Note: You can also modify most of the config items via web interface. In most cases overparallelizing is harmful, and might yield worse performance than not parallelizing at all.I think i’ve found something: haiwen/seafile-docs/blob/master/config/seahub_settings_py.md # Seahub Settings The chart now shows throttled events for both actions and triggers in your logic app workflow. In the second metric bar, from the Metric list, select Trigger Throttled Events. Don't go crazy with large values like 100 or 1000. In the first metric bar, from the Metric list, select Action Throttled Events. The request is throttled and the RateLimit headers are returned. HTTP/1.1 200 Ok RateLimit-Limit: 1200 RateLimit-Remaining: 120 RateLimit-Reset: 5 An application has consumed 100 of its resource unit quota, so it gets throttled due to this policy. Then you'll have to experiment with the MaxDegreeOfParallelism setting, until you find the one that yields the optimal performance. The request succeeds and the RateLimit headers are returned. My suggestion is to do the later: ConcurrentQueue listTest = new() Īfter doing these changes, hopefully your code will still work correctly, and it will be running a bit faster. You can either add a lock (listTest) before each listTest.Add, or replace it with a concurrent collection. The List is not thread safe, and so it will get corrupted if you call Add from multiple threads without synchronization. with this: ParallelOptions options = new() Īwait Parallel.ForEachAsync(rows, options, async (row, _) => I would replace this code: foreach (var row in rows) But since your code is complex, I would go the easy way and do just that. Generally you don't want to put this method inside an outer for/ foreach loop, because then the degree of parallelism will fluctuate during the whole operation. ![]() Ideally you would like to call the Parallel.ForEachAsync only once, so that it parallelizes your work with a single configurable degree of parallelism from start to finish. Your code is quite complex though, and deciding where to put this loop is not obvious. The most handy tool that is currently available for parallelizing asynchronous work is the Parallel.ForEachAsync method. Maybe I need to apply parallelism in the for loop?Īgain, really thanks to everyone in advance and I hope I was clear :) Var responsePatchContent = await resultPatch ![]() Var resultPatch = await httpClient.PatchAsync( TestWork.JobTaskNo, orderIdDiv.Id.ToString()) Var taskCase = await GetTaskForSyncing(httpClient, Var responseContent = await result.Contentīool alreadyExists = phrase.All(responseContent.Contains) Var result = await httpClient.PostAsync(url, content) Var content = new StringContent(jsonTest.ToString(), ![]() Var orderIdDiv = await this.GetOrderForSyncing(httpClient, Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total) Plugin Author WP Media (wpmedia) 1 year, 1 month ago. ''Request was throttled' is one only response you get. Var testWork = (Model.WorkOrderCompleteInfo)Mapper There are times you are ineffectual the log into your Robinhood account across web execution. The method is the following: public async Task> SyncOrdersTaskAsync(int PageSize) My question is the following: There is a way to optimize and speed up all the process? Maybe using multi threading, parallelism? I'm a beginner about it and I hope some of you help me understand. In that db table there are at least 165k rows. Expected available in 43414.0 seconds. I have a method that gets some information from my database and sends it to an external database using a post call and a patch call in case the information has changed. The following question might sound stupid and incorrect but I'm a beginner about it. Hello everyone and thanks for helping me in advance. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |